Wednesday, September 23, 2009

Photo_rant//


So...I have been thinking a lot about this project and what I have been working on at the moment. Some of this thinking coalesced last night when I had to rapidly write an artist statement for group show that may be happening with the jnr and snr photo group here. This is what I wrote:

These images represent an ongoing body of work that is exploring the idea of the human body in public and private space. It is examining the way in which we move through and interact with everyday spaces, so-called public spaces, private spaces and the exchanges we may or may not have within them.

This series of images aims to convey a feeling of dislocation, of confusion and bewilderment to the viewer about the idea of public space. These images aim to create confusion and bewilderment in the mind of the viewer and to make them aware of the growing confusion about what exactly is public space and does it really exist.

///So this wasn't really what I expected to write...but it kind of made sense in relation to what i am trying to do with these images. There are a lot of things going on (in my head) and dont know how much is being conveyed or not. In writing this last night it felt like the two sometimes disparate bodies of work that i have undertaken in the past months have finally found this point where they have merged together. But in saying that im not sure how i feel about this merge yet.

The floating people images have been a way of dealing with several things. The sudden change in the landscape that i am in, the way in which i have been feeling suspended in a new environment. But i would like them also to deal with the ideas of the human body in general and its relationship to space, and being here in the US seems to make it even more relevant to the nature of public/private space.

In saying this I recently re-read a post that Rachel left me. It was talking about Denis Darzacq and his flaoting people series. She mentioned the way in which the figure sin his work cast no shadows and are shot in flat landscapes and how this could reference that perhaps they do not fit in or belong in the landscape they have been shot in. Another intersting part of Rachel's comment was the way in which the lack of shadow could also reference the theft of soul, like the old photographic myth....

On top of all this im just not feeling hot about the floating images that i have been shooting in the last week or so...the first thing i need to do is go back and re-look at these first images:

I like this image more than the more recent ones where I am centred in the frame. I feel that the recent images have become focused soely on the figure rather then about the space that the figure is floating/suspended in. I want the figure to be a smaller part of the image, for the image to create more interest about the location that the figure is in...

RantyMcRanterson

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Hey Alex, I've been a bit silent, but I've been looking and thinking so it might be time to get some of my thoughts back to you...
Interesting that you refer to your images as 'floating' because I am struggling to find the 'floatyness' in them - this is part of what I've been thinking about: I agree with you about re-dressing the balance between the space and the figure and I the figure is part of what confuses me when I look at the images; I got very excited by the figure that was standing still in your recent image - what was it about this figure that struck me, that your other ones did not? have I seen too many of the 'jumpers' that they have become stagnant? or am I finding it hard to find a reason for the 'jump' other than the technical seduction of it? I think my questions then become - why is the figure 'jumping' and if he is actually meant to be floating, drifting, afloat, adrift - can this be shown better? Or should each image consider one of the copmplex emotions that you are exploring: "dislocation (...) confusion and bewilderment" and "suspended in a new environment" and "The sudden change in the landscape" and "the human body in (...)relationship to (public/private) space" and try to deal with only one thing at the time, considering more fully EACH landscape, and EACH figure. This would engage your thinking more towards the sum of the whole rather than the individual parts, which may be another way to think of an exhibition of such a body of work?
So...this is what I am thinking and it might be best to have a conversation about this if you would like to? Hope you are reading my comments in the context of 'your work is strong, and interesting, and thought-provoking and technically good' but here are some extra thoughts...
PLUS! get a link to my blog on your blog!
rachel